|
$(m, k)$-schemes for stiff systems of ODEs and DAEs
A. I. Levykinab, A. E. Novikovc, E. A. Novikovcd a Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics, Siberian Branch,
Russian Academy of Sciences, pr. Akad. Lavrent’eva 6, Novosibirsk, 630090 Russia
b Novosibirsk State University, ul. Pirogova 2, Novosibirsk, 630090 Russia
c Siberian Federal University, pr. Svobodnyi 79, Krasnoyarsk, 660041 Russia
d Institute of Computational Modeling, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences,
Akademgorodok 50/44, Krasnoyarsk, 660036 Russia
Abstract:
This paper deals with the derivation of the optimal form of the Rosenbrock-type methods in terms of the number of non-zero parameters and computational costs per step. A technique of obtaining $(m, k)$-methods from the well-known Rosenbrock-type methods is justified. There are given formulas for the $(m, k)$-schemes parameters transformation for their two canonical representations and obtaining the form of a stability function. The authors have developed $L$-stable $(3, 2)$-method of order $3$ which requires two evaluations of a function: one evaluation of the Jacobian matrix and one $LU$-decomposition per step. Moreover, in this paper there is formulated an integration algorithm of the alternating step size based on $(3, 2)$-method. It provides the numerical solution for both explicit and implicit systems of ODEs. The numerical results confirming the efficiency of the new algorithm are given.
Key words:
Rosenbrock-type methods, differential-algebraic equations, stiff systems of ODEs.
Received: 14.01.2019 Revised: 04.04.2019 Accepted: 15.10.2019
Citation:
A. I. Levykin, A. E. Novikov, E. A. Novikov, “$(m, k)$-schemes for stiff systems of ODEs and DAEs”, Sib. Zh. Vychisl. Mat., 23:1 (2020), 39–51; Num. Anal. Appl., 13:1 (2020), 34–44
Linking options:
https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/sjvm731 https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/sjvm/v23/i1/p39
|
Statistics & downloads: |
Abstract page: | 148 | Full-text PDF : | 28 | References: | 40 | First page: | 11 |
|