40 citations to https://www.mathnet.ru/rus/tmf4088
-
J. Brian Pitts, “Does a second-class primary constraint generate a gauge transformation? Electromagnetisms and gravities, massless and massive”, Annals of Physics, 462 (2024), 169621
-
Anamaria Hell, “The strong couplings of massive Yang-Mills theory”, J. High Energ. Phys., 2022:3 (2022)
-
Anamaria Hell, “On the duality of massive Kalb-Ramond and Proca fields”, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2022:01 (2022), 056
-
Kei-Ichi Kondo, Masaki Watanabe, Yui Hayashi, Ryutaro Matsudo, Yutaro Suda, “Reflection positivity and complex analysis of the Yang–Mills theory from a viewpoint of gluon confinement”, Eur. Phys. J. C, 80:2 (2020)
-
Tian Yu Cao, Conceptual Developments of 20th Century Field Theories, 2019
-
Alexander Reshetnyak, “Generalization of Faddeev–Popov rules in Yang–Mills theories: N = 3,4 BRST symmetries”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 33:03 (2018), 1850006
-
M. A. L. Capri, D. M. van Egmond, M. S. Guimaraes, O. Holanda, S. P. Sorella, R. C. Terin, H. C. Toledo, “Renormalizability of
${\mathcal {N}}=1$
N
=
1
super Yang–Mills theory in Landau gauge with a Stueckelberg-like field”, Eur. Phys. J. C, 78:10 (2018) -
Pitts J.B., “Equivalent theories redefine Hamiltonian observables to exhibit change in general relativity”, Class. Quantum Gravity, 34:5 (2017), 055008
-
Buchbinder I.L. Ivanov E.A. Pletnev N.G., “Superfield approach to the construction of effective action in quantum field theory with extended supersymmetry”, Phys. Part. Nuclei, 47:3 (2016), 291–369
-
Pitts J.B., “Space–time philosophy reconstructed via massive Nordström scalar gravities? Laws vs. geometry, conventionality, and underdetermination”, Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys., 53 (2016), 73–92