40 citations to https://www.mathnet.ru/rus/tmf4088
  1. J. Brian Pitts, “Does a second-class primary constraint generate a gauge transformation? Electromagnetisms and gravities, massless and massive”, Annals of Physics, 462 (2024), 169621  crossref
  2. Anamaria Hell, “The strong couplings of massive Yang-Mills theory”, J. High Energ. Phys., 2022:3 (2022)  crossref
  3. Anamaria Hell, “On the duality of massive Kalb-Ramond and Proca fields”, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2022:01 (2022), 056  crossref
  4. Kei-Ichi Kondo, Masaki Watanabe, Yui Hayashi, Ryutaro Matsudo, Yutaro Suda, “Reflection positivity and complex analysis of the Yang–Mills theory from a viewpoint of gluon confinement”, Eur. Phys. J. C, 80:2 (2020)  crossref
  5. Tian Yu Cao, Conceptual Developments of 20th Century Field Theories, 2019  crossref
  6. Alexander Reshetnyak, “Generalization of Faddeev–Popov rules in Yang–Mills theories: N = 3,4 BRST symmetries”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 33:03 (2018), 1850006  crossref
  7. M. A. L. Capri, D. M. van Egmond, M. S. Guimaraes, O. Holanda, S. P. Sorella, R. C. Terin, H. C. Toledo, “Renormalizability of
    ${\mathcal {N}}=1$
    N = 1
    super Yang–Mills theory in Landau gauge with a Stueckelberg-like field”, Eur. Phys. J. C, 78:10 (2018)  crossref
  8. Pitts J.B., “Equivalent theories redefine Hamiltonian observables to exhibit change in general relativity”, Class. Quantum Gravity, 34:5 (2017), 055008  crossref  mathscinet  isi  scopus
  9. Buchbinder I.L. Ivanov E.A. Pletnev N.G., “Superfield approach to the construction of effective action in quantum field theory with extended supersymmetry”, Phys. Part. Nuclei, 47:3 (2016), 291–369  crossref  isi  elib  scopus
  10. Pitts J.B., “Space–time philosophy reconstructed via massive Nordström scalar gravities? Laws vs. geometry, conventionality, and underdetermination”, Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys., 53 (2016), 73–92  crossref  mathscinet  zmath  isi  scopus
1
2
3
4
Следующая