47 citations to https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/imrn3
  1. A. I. Efimov, “On the homotopy finiteness of DG categories”, Russian Math. Surveys, 74:3 (2019), 431–460  mathnet  crossref  crossref  mathscinet  zmath  adsnasa  isi  elib
  2. Andreas Hochenegger, Andreas Krug, “Formality of -objects”, Compositio Math., 155:5 (2019), 973  crossref
  3. Emanuele Macrì, Paolo Stellari, Lecture Notes of the Unione Matematica Italiana, 26, Birational Geometry of Hypersurfaces, 2019, 199  crossref
  4. Alexander Perry, “Noncommutative homological projective duality”, Advances in Mathematics, 350 (2019), 877  crossref
  5. Andrew Harder, Ludmil Katzarkov, “Perverse sheaves of categories and some applications”, Advances in Mathematics, 352 (2019), 1155  crossref
  6. E. Ballico, S. Barmeier, E. Gasparim, L. Grama, L. A. B. San Martin, “A Lie theoretical construction of a Landau–Ginzburg model without projective mirrors”, manuscripta math., 158:1-2 (2019), 85  crossref
  7. D. O. Orlov, “Derived noncommutative schemes, geometric realizations, and finite dimensional algebras”, Russian Math. Surveys, 73:5 (2018), 865–918  mathnet  crossref  crossref  mathscinet  zmath  adsnasa  isi  elib
  8. Andreas Krug, David Ploog, Pawel Sosna, “Derived categories of resolutions of cyclic quotient singularities”, The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics, 69:2 (2018), 509  crossref
  9. Martin Kalck, Joseph Karmazyn, “Ringel duality for certain strongly quasi-hereditary algebras”, European Journal of Mathematics, 4:3 (2018), 1100  crossref
  10. D. Kaledin, “How to glue derived categories”, Bull. Math. Sci., 8:3 (2018), 477–602  mathnet  mathnet  crossref  isi  scopus
Previous
1
2
3
4
5
Next