|
Vestnik Udmurtskogo Universiteta. Matematika. Mekhanika. Komp'yuternye Nauki, 2014, Issue 3, Pages 110–122
(Mi vuu444)
|
|
|
|
This article is cited in 1 scientific paper (total in 1 paper)
MECHANICS
Comparison of quasisteady and nonsteady mathematical models of fluid flow in evaporating drop with due regard for the viscosity
K. S. Kolegovab a Caspian Institute of Sea and River Transport, Branch of
the Volga State Aademy of Water Transport, ul. Kostina, 2, Astrakhan, 414014, Russia
b Astrakhan State University, ul. Tatishcheva, 20a, Astrakhan, 414056, Russia
Abstract:
Applicability limits of a quasisteady approach to modelling the fluid dynamics in evaporated drop on a substrate (with constant contact area) and in circular well are defined in this paper. A nonsteady model is
considered for comparison. Quasisteady and nonsteady (with the full-form equation of motion) sets of
equations have been solved numerically. The modeling is carried out at different values of evaporation rate
and capillary number. Water and ethylene glycol drops were taken as examples. Analysis of calculated data
shows that results obtained for the final stage of pure solvent evaporation by using two models differ from
each other. Velocity of a radial flow calculated with the help of nonsteady model agrees with experimental
data much better than the result obtained using a quasisteady approach at the final stage of process. This is
because at the final stage of evaporation the quasisteady approach works poorly due to the rapid changes in
the relative film thickness and high velocities.
Keywords:
evaporating drop, radial flow, drop on a substrate, pinning, circular well.
Received: 28.06.2014
Citation:
K. S. Kolegov, “Comparison of quasisteady and nonsteady mathematical models of fluid flow in evaporating drop with due regard for the viscosity”, Vestn. Udmurtsk. Univ. Mat. Mekh. Komp. Nauki, 2014, no. 3, 110–122
Linking options:
https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/vuu444 https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/vuu/y2014/i3/p110
|
Statistics & downloads: |
Abstract page: | 249 | Full-text PDF : | 202 | References: | 47 |
|