Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Seriya 10. Prikladnaya Matematika. Informatika. Protsessy Upravleniya
RUS  ENG    JOURNALS   PEOPLE   ORGANISATIONS   CONFERENCES   SEMINARS   VIDEO LIBRARY   PACKAGE AMSBIB  
General information
Latest issue
Archive

Search papers
Search references

RSS
Latest issue
Current issues
Archive issues
What is RSS



Vestnik S.-Petersburg Univ. Ser. 10. Prikl. Mat. Inform. Prots. Upr.:
Year:
Volume:
Issue:
Page:
Find






Personal entry:
Login:
Password:
Save password
Enter
Forgotten password?
Register


Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Seriya 10. Prikladnaya Matematika. Informatika. Protsessy Upravleniya, 2015, Issue 1, Pages 42–63 (Mi vspui228)  

This article is cited in 1 scientific paper (total in 1 paper)

Applied mathematics

Two-level cooperation in technological alliance differential games

N. V. Kolabutin

St. Petersburg State University, 7/9, Universitetskaya embankment, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
Full-text PDF (380 kB) Citations (1)
References:
Abstract: The paper is devoted to two-level cooperation in differential games. Cooperative differential games are currently one of most important parts of game theory. They mathematically describe the conflict-controlled processes in management and economics. The solution of a differential game is a cooperative agreement, and the selected principle of optimality, according to which the received payoff is distributed. Studies showed that initially selected cooperative solution often loses its optimality over time. Therefore, the question arose about the stability of the co-operative solutions. The issue of dynamic stability or time consistency is considered. This concept was formalized by L. A. Petrosyan. Cooperative solution is dynamically stable if the principle of optimality selected early in the game stays consistent throughout the gameplay. For dynamic stability it is necessary at each moment of time to carry out the regularization of the chosen principle of optimality. For this regularization L. A. Petrosyan proposed to use the redistribution of received payoff in accordance with the “imputation distribution procedure”. In some cases coalitional solutions in differential games are studied, where the coalitions act as individual players. Coalitions play with each other in a noncooperative game, and payoff of each coalition is distributed among its members in accordance with some principle of optimality. In this paper we began to investigate the model in which participants form coalitions, acting as individual players, but the coalitions may also cooperate to increase joint payoff. In this case, the coalition play their cooperative game, maximizing overall benefits and distributing them among themselves according to some principle of optimality. Then, payoff of each coalition is distributed among its members as well according to maybe a different principle of optimality. Such cooperation is called two-level cooperation. Principles of profit distribution between coalitions and within coalition may be different. To solve such models which is required at both levels of the cooperation it is necessary to build the characteristic function and imputation distribution procedure. This paper describes a model of a two-level cooperation on the example of a technological alliance differential game. Participants in the game are the firms with the technology that brings profit. On the first (lower) level firms form coalitions to increase joint profit. On the second (upper) level coalitions act as individual players and also form the one grand coalition to increase the joint profit. The resulting top-level payoff is distributed between coalitions-participants. Thus, each coalition party may get more than it would receive by playing individually. Then each coalition distributes the resulting share of payoff among its member firms. This article also presented a stable cooperative solution in this model. For its implementation at every level of cooperation we build the characteristic function and prove its superadditivity. As a sharing the dynamic Shapley value is selected. The results are illustrated by a quantitative example. Bibliogr. 8. Tables 2.
Keywords: differential game, cooperation, imputation distribution procedure.
Received: November 13, 2014
Bibliographic databases:
Document Type: Article
UDC: 517.977.8
Language: Russian
Citation: N. V. Kolabutin, “Two-level cooperation in technological alliance differential games”, Vestnik S.-Petersburg Univ. Ser. 10. Prikl. Mat. Inform. Prots. Upr., 2015, no. 1, 42–63
Citation in format AMSBIB
\Bibitem{Kol15}
\by N.~V.~Kolabutin
\paper Two-level cooperation in technological alliance differential games
\jour Vestnik S.-Petersburg Univ. Ser. 10. Prikl. Mat. Inform. Prots. Upr.
\yr 2015
\issue 1
\pages 42--63
\mathnet{http://mi.mathnet.ru/vspui228}
\elib{https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22988792}
Linking options:
  • https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/vspui228
  • https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/vspui/y2015/i1/p42
  • This publication is cited in the following 1 articles:
    Citing articles in Google Scholar: Russian citations, English citations
    Related articles in Google Scholar: Russian articles, English articles
    Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Серия 10. Прикладная математика. Информатика. Процессы управления
    Statistics & downloads:
    Abstract page:102
    Full-text PDF :22
    References:9
    First page:4
     
      Contact us:
     Terms of Use  Registration to the website  Logotypes © Steklov Mathematical Institute RAS, 2024