|
This article is cited in 2 scientific papers (total in 2 papers)
LETTERS TO THE EDITORS
Once again about supercavity modes (a response to the letter to the editors of Physics–Uspekhi from V V Klimov [Phys. Usp. 62 (10) (2019); Usp. Fiz. Nauk 189 (10) 1131 (2019)] with comments on the review by M V Rybin and M F Limonov “Resonance effects in photonic crystals and metamaterials” [Phys. Usp. 62 (8) 823 (2019); Usp. Fiz. Nauk 189 (8) 881 (2019)])
M. V. Rybin, M. F. Limonov Ioffe Institute, St. Petersburg
Abstract:
In this letter, we demonstrate the fallacy of the provisions and conclusions set forth in the letter to the editors of Physics–Uspekhi by V V Klimov [Phys. Usp. 62 (10) 1058 (2019)]. The author discusses the review by M V Rybin and M F Limonov [Phys. Usp. 62 (8) 823 (2019)] and makes a number of conclusions that have nothing to do with the content of the review and the original work on which the review is based. Also, V V Klimov's conclusions contradict well-known data in the literature.
Received: October 21, 2019 Accepted: October 31, 2019
Citation:
M. V. Rybin, M. F. Limonov, “Once again about supercavity modes (a response to the letter to the editors of Physics–Uspekhi from V V Klimov [Phys. Usp. 62 (10) (2019); Usp. Fiz. Nauk 189 (10) 1131 (2019)] with comments on the review by M V Rybin and M F Limonov “Resonance effects in photonic crystals and metamaterials” [Phys. Usp. 62 (8) 823 (2019); Usp. Fiz. Nauk 189 (8) 881 (2019)])”, UFN, 189:12 (2019), 1364–1366; Phys. Usp., 62:12 (2019), 1279–1281
Linking options:
https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/ufn6678 https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/ufn/v189/i12/p1364
|
Statistics & downloads: |
Abstract page: | 167 | Full-text PDF : | 20 | References: | 22 | First page: | 10 |
|