Trudy SPIIRAN
RUS  ENG    JOURNALS   PEOPLE   ORGANISATIONS   CONFERENCES   SEMINARS   VIDEO LIBRARY   PACKAGE AMSBIB  
General information
Latest issue
Archive

Search papers
Search references

RSS
Latest issue
Current issues
Archive issues
What is RSS



Informatics and Automation:
Year:
Volume:
Issue:
Page:
Find






Personal entry:
Login:
Password:
Save password
Enter
Forgotten password?
Register


Trudy SPIIRAN, 2020, Issue 19, volume 6, Pages 1131–1165
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15622/ia.2020.19.6.1
(Mi trspy1128)
 

This article is cited in 2 scientific papers (total in 2 papers)

Mathematical Modeling, Numerical Methods

Justification and classification of evaluation fused in rating methods of multi-criteria choice

S. Mikoni, D. Burakov

St.-Petersburg Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SPb FRC RAS)
Abstract: The recommendations on the application of methods of multidimensional estimation (MDE) of objects, proposed in the paper Velasquez M., Hester P.T. «An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods», are analyzed. The weak substantiation of these recommendations, resulting from the superficial systematization of MDE methods, is noted. The recommendations are focused not on the classes of MDE methods, but on various areas of activity. However, in each area of activity there is a wide range of tasks for evaluating objects of various nature. In this regard, the urgency of a more thorough systematization of MDE methods is recognized.
Taking into account the diversity of MDE methods, it was decided to limit ourselves to the systematization of methods that use evaluation functions (EF), and on this basis to offer general recommendations for their application.
The review of MDE methods from a unified position required clarification of the terminology used in them. On the basis of the formal model of the criterion, the relationship between the concepts of "preference  "criterion" and "indicator" is established. To highlight the methods that use evaluation functions, the concept of the target value of the indicator is introduced. Regarding its location on the indicator scale, the concepts of ideal and real goals are introduced. The criteria corresponding to these goals are divided into target and restrictive ones. Using the proposed terminology, a review of the most well-known MDE methods was carried out. Of these, a group of methods using evaluation functions is distinguished.
Variants of evaluation functions created on the basis of the criterion and postulates of the theory of value and utility are considered. On the basis of the similarity of the domains of definition and the meanings of EFs, the relationship between them is established. Regarding the target value of the indicator, they are divided into the functions of achieving the goal and functions of deviation from the goal. The mutual complementarity of these functions is shown. A group of functions of deviation from the goal is highlighted, which allows us to order objects separately according to penalties and rewards in relation to achieving a real goal. The concept of norm is introduced for the correspondence relation. On the example of medical analyzes, the practical application of deviation functions from the norm is shown using both the minimax and the weighted average generalizing function to establish a rating on a set of objects.
The similarities and differences of the EFs revealed in the course of the study form the basis for the classification of the MDE methods that use them. The difference in EFs in terms of the complexity of creation is reflected in the proposed methodology for their application.
Keywords: preference, indicator, criterion, target value, evaluation function, value function, utility function, goal achievement, deviation from the goal, functional choice, multidimensional evaluation of objects, rating method.
Funding agency Grant number
Russian Foundation for Basic Research 19-08-00989_а
20-08-01046
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation 0073–2019–0004
This research is supported by RFBR (grants No 19–08–00989–а, No 20–08–01046) within the budgetary theme No 0073–2019–0004.
Received: 28.08.2020
Document Type: Article
UDC: 519.81
Language: Russian
Citation: S. Mikoni, D. Burakov, “Justification and classification of evaluation fused in rating methods of multi-criteria choice”, Tr. SPIIRAN, 19:6 (2020), 1131–1165
Citation in format AMSBIB
\Bibitem{MikBur20}
\by S.~Mikoni, D.~Burakov
\paper Justification and classification of evaluation fused in rating methods of multi-criteria choice
\jour Tr. SPIIRAN
\yr 2020
\vol 19
\issue 6
\pages 1131--1165
\mathnet{http://mi.mathnet.ru/trspy1128}
\crossref{https://doi.org/10.15622/ia.2020.19.6.1}
Linking options:
  • https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/trspy1128
  • https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/trspy/v19/i6/p1131
  • This publication is cited in the following 2 articles:
    Citing articles in Google Scholar: Russian citations, English citations
    Related articles in Google Scholar: Russian articles, English articles
    Informatics and Automation
    Statistics & downloads:
    Abstract page:86
    Full-text PDF :168
     
      Contact us:
     Terms of Use  Registration to the website  Logotypes © Steklov Mathematical Institute RAS, 2024