Abstract:
On the example of the gravitational collapse the essential difference between the
predictions of RTG and GRT is demonstrated. According to RTG, static as well as
nonstatic spherically symmetric bodies with the radius less or equal to mG cannot exist
in Nature.
Citation:
A. A. Vlasov, A. A. Logunov, “Difference between gravitational collapse in the relativistic theory of gravitation and in the general theory of relativity”, TMF, 71:3 (1987), 323–330; Theoret. and Math. Phys., 71:3 (1987), 565–570
\Bibitem{VlaLog87}
\by A.~A.~Vlasov, A.~A.~Logunov
\paper Difference between gravitational collapse in the relativistic theory of gravitation and in the general theory of relativity
\jour TMF
\yr 1987
\vol 71
\issue 3
\pages 323--330
\mathnet{http://mi.mathnet.ru/tmf4960}
\mathscinet{http://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=910268}
\zmath{https://zbmath.org/?q=an:0621.53062}
\transl
\jour Theoret. and Math. Phys.
\yr 1987
\vol 71
\issue 3
\pages 565--570
\crossref{https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01017086}
\isi{https://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Publons&SrcAuth=Publons_CEL&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=A1987L575800001}
Linking options:
https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/tmf4960
https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/tmf/v71/i3/p323
This publication is cited in the following 1 articles:
Vladimir V. Sokolov, “Linear and nonlinear gravidynamics: static field of a collapsar”, Astrophys Space Sci, 191:2 (1992), 231
Citation in format AMSBIB
Contact us: