Abstract:
We argue extensively in favor of our earlier choice of the in and out states (among the solutions of a wave equation with one-dimensional potential). In this connection, we study the nonstationary and “stationary” families of complete sets of solutions of the Klein–Gordon equation with a constant electric field. A nonstationary set ψpv consists of the solutions with the quantum number pv=p0v−p3. It can be obtained from the nonstationary set ψp3 with the quantum number p3 by a boost along the x3 axis (in the direction of the electric field) with the velocity −v. By changing the gauge, we can bring the solutions in all sets to the same potential without changing quantum numbers. Then the transformations of solutions in one set (with the quantum number pv) to the solutions in another set (with the quantum number pv′) have group properties. The stationary solutions and sets have the same properties as the nonstationary ones and are obtainable from stationary solutions with the quantum number p0 by the same boost. It turns out that each set can be obtained from any other by gauge manipulations. All sets are therefore equivalent, and the classification (i.e., assigning the frequency sign and the in and out indices) in any set is determined by the classification in the set ψp3, where it is obvious.
Keywords:
gauge invariance, Klein–Gordon equation, complete sets of solutions of the wave equation.
Citation:
A. I. Nikishov, “Equivalent Sets of Solutions of the Klein–Gordon Equation with a Constant Electric Field”, TMF, 136:1 (2003), 77–89; Theoret. and Math. Phys., 136:1 (2003), 958–969
\Bibitem{Nik03}
\by A.~I.~Nikishov
\paper Equivalent Sets of Solutions of the Klein--Gordon Equation with a Constant Electric Field
\jour TMF
\yr 2003
\vol 136
\issue 1
\pages 77--89
\mathnet{http://mi.mathnet.ru/tmf211}
\crossref{https://doi.org/10.4213/tmf211}
\mathscinet{http://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1256712}
\transl
\jour Theoret. and Math. Phys.
\yr 2003
\vol 136
\issue 1
\pages 958--969
\crossref{https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024637205939}
\isi{https://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Publons&SrcAuth=Publons_CEL&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000184767700006}
Linking options:
https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/tmf211
https://doi.org/10.4213/tmf211
https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/tmf/v136/i1/p77
This publication is cited in the following 6 articles:
Ferreiro A., Navarro-Salas J., “Pair Creation in Electric Fields, Anomalies, and Renormalization of the Electric Current”, Phys. Rev. D, 97:12 (2018), 125012
Tilbi A. Merad M. Boudjedaa T., “Particles of Spin Zero and 1/2 in Electromagnetic Field With Confining Scalar Potential in Modified Heisenberg Algebra”, Few-Body Syst., 56:2-3 (2015), 139–147
Ilderton A., Torgrimsson G., Wardh J., “Nonperturbative Pair Production in Interpolating Fields”, Phys. Rev. D, 92:6 (2015), 065001
Ilderton A., “Localisation in Worldline Pair Production and Lightfront Zero-Modes”, J. High Energy Phys., 2014, no. 9, 166
Merad M., Zeroual F., Falek M., “Relativistic Particle in Electromagnetic Fields with a Generalized Uncertainty Principle”, Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 27:15 (2012), 1250080
Nikishov AI, “Scattering and pair production by a potential barrier”, Physics of Atomic Nuclei, 67:8 (2004), 1478–1486