Proceedings of the Institute for System Programming of the RAS
RUS  ENG    JOURNALS   PEOPLE   ORGANISATIONS   CONFERENCES   SEMINARS   VIDEO LIBRARY   PACKAGE AMSBIB  
General information
Latest issue
Archive

Search papers
Search references

RSS
Latest issue
Current issues
Archive issues
What is RSS



Proceedings of ISP RAS:
Year:
Volume:
Issue:
Page:
Find






Personal entry:
Login:
Password:
Save password
Enter
Forgotten password?
Register


Proceedings of the Institute for System Programming of the RAS, 2018, Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages 251–270
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15514/ISPRAS-2018-30(3)-18
(Mi tisp338)
 

This article is cited in 2 scientific papers (total in 2 papers)

Applying the methods of system analysis to teaching assistants’ evaluation

E. Beresneva, M. Gordenko

Department of Software Engineering, National Research University Higher School of Economics
Full-text PDF (628 kB) Citations (2)
References:
Abstract: This article presents the results of applying various methods of system analysis (CATWOE, Rich Picture, AHP, Fuzzy AHP) to evaluation of teaching assistants. The soft and hard methods were applied. Methods of system analysis are considered as an example at the Higher School of Economics (HSE) in program “Teaching assistant”. The article shows the process of interaction of teaching assistants with students and faculty in the form of Rich Picture. Selection and analysis of criteria for the evaluation of training assistants are carried out. Three groups of criteria were defined: professional skills, communicating skills, personal qualities. Each group has some subcriteria, which were defined in brainstorm. Its own method was determined, which immediately allow drop some assistants. In addition, the application of the methods AHP and Fuzzy AHP type-2 to evaluate teaching assistants is considered. The strengths and weaknesses of each method are revealed. It is also shown that, despite the power of the methods of system analysis, it is necessary to use common sense and logic. Do not rely only on the numbers obtained by the methods of system analysis. In the process of work, the best teaching assistant is selected, and the group of the best teaching assistants is defined.
Keywords: system analysis, combination of soft and hard methods, multicriteria decision making (MCDM), AHP, type-2 fuzzy sets, Fuzzy AHP.
Bibliographic databases:
Document Type: Article
Language: English
Citation: E. Beresneva, M. Gordenko, “Applying the methods of system analysis to teaching assistants’ evaluation”, Proceedings of ISP RAS, 30:3 (2018), 251–270
Citation in format AMSBIB
\Bibitem{BerGor18}
\by E.~Beresneva, M.~Gordenko
\paper Applying the methods of system analysis to teaching assistants’ evaluation
\jour Proceedings of ISP RAS
\yr 2018
\vol 30
\issue 3
\pages 251--270
\mathnet{http://mi.mathnet.ru/tisp338}
\crossref{https://doi.org/10.15514/ISPRAS-2018-30(3)-18}
\elib{https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35192509}
Linking options:
  • https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/tisp338
  • https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/tisp/v30/i3/p251
  • This publication is cited in the following 2 articles:
    Citing articles in Google Scholar: Russian citations, English citations
    Related articles in Google Scholar: Russian articles, English articles
    Proceedings of the Institute for System Programming of the RAS
    Statistics & downloads:
    Abstract page:122
    Full-text PDF :83
    References:27
     
      Contact us:
     Terms of Use  Registration to the website  Logotypes © Steklov Mathematical Institute RAS, 2024