Sistemy i Sredstva Informatiki [Systems and Means of Informatics]
RUS  ENG    JOURNALS   PEOPLE   ORGANISATIONS   CONFERENCES   SEMINARS   VIDEO LIBRARY   PACKAGE AMSBIB  
General information
Latest issue
Archive
Impact factor

Search papers
Search references

RSS
Latest issue
Current issues
Archive issues
What is RSS



Sistemy i Sredstva Inform.:
Year:
Volume:
Issue:
Page:
Find






Personal entry:
Login:
Password:
Save password
Enter
Forgotten password?
Register


Sistemy i Sredstva Informatiki [Systems and Means of Informatics], 2022, Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 73–82
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14357/08696527220107
(Mi ssi813)
 

This article is cited in 4 scientific papers (total in 4 papers)

Interrelation between the software-defined and conventional IP-networks

V. B. Egorov

Federal Research Center "Computer Science and Control" of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 44-2 Vavilov Str., Moscow 119333, Russian Federation
Full-text PDF (205 kB) Citations (4)
References:
Abstract: Software-defined networking (SDN) is a centralized network control concept that postulates concentration of all control plane functions in a logically single programmatic network controller, simplification of data plane nodes to primitive switches, and a unified protocol, OpenFlow, particularly, of interaction between them and the controller. The SDN idea was born and initially implemented within academic laboratories. However, its expansion to data centers and, subsequently, to provider networks revealed a number of weak spots. The network bootstrapping and remote configuring were among them since these procedures cannot be accomplished using solely the OpenFlow means and do not fit into the original SDN framework. The SDN networks deployment practice showed the impracticability of the refusal from the TCP / IP protocol stack which remains indispensable, in particular, for SDN network bootstrapping and remote configuring. As a result, in the reality, we observe the SDN network nodes as some traditional full-fledged routers, only augmented with the supplementary OpenFlow functionality, instead of the conceptual simple pure OpenFlow switches, while the SDN networks themselves remain trivial IP networks with the centralized control being not full-sufficient and provided as an optional supplement.
Keywords: bootstrapping, software-defined networking, remote network configuring, OF-CONFIG, OpenFlow.
Received: 18.08.2021
Bibliographic databases:
Document Type: Article
Language: Russian
Citation: V. B. Egorov, “Interrelation between the software-defined and conventional IP-networks”, Sistemy i Sredstva Inform., 32:1 (2022), 73–82
Citation in format AMSBIB
\Bibitem{Ego22}
\by V.~B.~Egorov
\paper Interrelation between~the~software-defined and~conventional IP-networks
\jour Sistemy i Sredstva Inform.
\yr 2022
\vol 32
\issue 1
\pages 73--82
\mathnet{http://mi.mathnet.ru/ssi813}
\crossref{https://doi.org/10.14357/08696527220107}
\mathscinet{http://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=4405860}
Linking options:
  • https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/ssi813
  • https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/ssi/v32/i1/p73
  • This publication is cited in the following 4 articles:
    Citing articles in Google Scholar: Russian citations, English citations
    Related articles in Google Scholar: Russian articles, English articles
    Системы и средства информатики
    Statistics & downloads:
    Abstract page:82
    Full-text PDF :37
    References:6
     
      Contact us:
     Terms of Use  Registration to the website  Logotypes © Steklov Mathematical Institute RAS, 2024