|
This article is cited in 5 scientific papers (total in 5 papers)
Best methods for approximating analytic functions given with an error
K. Yu. Osipenko
Abstract:
Let $B$ be the class of analytic functions of modulus at most 1 in the disk $|z|<1$, and let $z_1,\dots,z_n$ be distinct points in the interval $(-1,1)$. This article takes up the problem of finding the quantity
$$
r(z_0,z_1,\dots,z_n,\delta)=\inf_T\,\sup_{f \in B}\,\sup_{\|\widetilde f-\overline f\|_\infty\leqslant\delta}\vert f(z_0)-T(\widehat f)|,
$$
where the infimum is over all possible methods $T\colon\mathbf R^n\to \mathbf{R}$, $\widetilde f=(\widetilde f_1,\dots,\widetilde f_n)$, $\overline f=(f(z_1),\dots,f(z_n))$. It is determined that, depending on the error $\delta$, the information about the approximate values of functions in $B$ at some of the points can turn out to be superfluous. The order of informativeness of the system $z_1,\dots,z_n$ is found, i.e., the smallest $k$ for which there exists a subsystem $z_{i_1},\dots,z_{i_k}$ such that $r(z_0,z_{i_1},\dots,z_{i_k},\delta)=r(z_0,z_1,\dots,z_n,\delta)$. A best method of approximation is constructed, and the dependence of the order of informativeness on the size of the error $\delta$ is investigated.
Bibliography: 21 titles.
Received: 17.04.1981
Citation:
K. Yu. Osipenko, “Best methods for approximating analytic functions given with an error”, Mat. Sb. (N.S.), 118(160):3(7) (1982), 350–370; Math. USSR-Sb., 46:3 (1983), 353–374
Linking options:
https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/sm2256https://doi.org/10.1070/SM1983v046n03ABEH002939 https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/sm/v160/i3/p350
|
Statistics & downloads: |
Abstract page: | 351 | Russian version PDF: | 129 | English version PDF: | 6 | References: | 56 |
|