Russian Mathematical Surveys
RUS  ENG    JOURNALS   PEOPLE   ORGANISATIONS   CONFERENCES   SEMINARS   VIDEO LIBRARY   PACKAGE AMSBIB  
General information
Latest issue
Archive
Impact factor
Submit a manuscript

Search papers
Search references

RSS
Latest issue
Current issues
Archive issues
What is RSS



Uspekhi Mat. Nauk:
Year:
Volume:
Issue:
Page:
Find






Personal entry:
Login:
Password:
Save password
Enter
Forgotten password?
Register


Russian Mathematical Surveys, 2017, Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages 199–256
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1070/RM9759
(Mi rm9759)
 

This article is cited in 33 scientific papers (total in 34 papers)

Cohomological rigidity of manifolds defined by 3-dimensional polytopes

V. M. Buchstaberabc, N. Yu. Erokhovetsb, M. Masudad, T. E. Panovbec, S. Parkd

a Steklov Mathematical Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow
b Moscow State University
c Institute for Information Transmission Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow
d Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan
e Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow
References:
Abstract: A family of closed manifolds is said to be cohomologically rigid if a cohomology ring isomorphism implies a diffeomorphism for any two manifolds in the family. Cohomological rigidity is established here for large families of 3-dimensional and 6-dimensional manifolds defined by 3-dimensional polytopes. The class $\mathscr{P}$ of 3-dimensional combinatorial simple polytopes $P$ different from tetrahedra and without facets forming 3- and 4-belts is studied. This class includes mathematical fullerenes, that is, simple 3-polytopes with only 5-gonal and 6-gonal facets. By a theorem of Pogorelov, any polytope in $\mathscr{P}$ admits in Lobachevsky 3-space a right-angled realisation which is unique up to isometry. Our families of smooth manifolds are associated with polytopes in the class $\mathscr{P}$. The first family consists of 3-dimensional small covers of polytopes in $\mathscr{P}$, or equivalently, hyperbolic 3-manifolds of Löbell type. The second family consists of 6-dimensional quasitoric manifolds over polytopes in $\mathscr{P}$. Our main result is that both families are cohomologically rigid, that is, two manifolds $M$ and $M'$ from either family are diffeomorphic if and only if their cohomology rings are isomorphic. It is also proved that if $M$ and $M'$ are diffeomorphic, then their corresponding polytopes $P$ and $P'$ are combinatorially equivalent. These results are intertwined with classical subjects in geometry and topology such as the combinatorics of 3-polytopes, the Four Colour Theorem, aspherical manifolds, a diffeomorphism classification of 6-manifolds, and invariance of Pontryagin classes. The proofs use techniques of toric topology.
Bibliography: 69 titles.
Keywords: quasitoric manifold, moment-angle manifold, hyperbolic manifold, small cover, simple polytope, right-angled polytope, cohomology ring, cohomological rigidity.
Funding agency Grant number
Russian Foundation for Basic Research 17-01-00671
16-51-55017-ГФЕН
Contest «Young Russian Mathematics»
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 16K05152
The research of the first, second, and fourth authors was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grant nos. 17-01-00671 and 16-51-55017-ГФЕН). The second author was supported by the Young Russian Mathematics Award. The third author was supported by the JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (grant no. 16K05152).
Received: 20.12.2016
Bibliographic databases:
Document Type: Article
MSC: Primary 57R91, 57M50; Secondary 05C15, 14M25, 52A55, 52B10
Language: English
Original paper language: Russian
Citation: V. M. Buchstaber, N. Yu. Erokhovets, M. Masuda, T. E. Panov, S. Park, “Cohomological rigidity of manifolds defined by 3-dimensional polytopes”, Russian Math. Surveys, 72:2 (2017), 199–256
Citation in format AMSBIB
\Bibitem{BucEroMas17}
\by V.~M.~Buchstaber, N.~Yu.~Erokhovets, M.~Masuda, T.~E.~Panov, S.~Park
\paper Cohomological rigidity of manifolds defined by 3-dimensional polytopes
\jour Russian Math. Surveys
\yr 2017
\vol 72
\issue 2
\pages 199--256
\mathnet{http://mi.mathnet.ru//eng/rm9759}
\crossref{https://doi.org/10.1070/RM9759}
\mathscinet{http://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=3635437}
\zmath{https://zbmath.org/?q=an:1383.57038}
\adsnasa{https://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/bib_query?2017RuMaS..72..199B}
\isi{https://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Publons&SrcAuth=Publons_CEL&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000406101400001}
\elib{https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28931453}
\scopus{https://www.scopus.com/record/display.url?origin=inward&eid=2-s2.0-85026636122}
Linking options:
  • https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/rm9759
  • https://doi.org/10.1070/RM9759
  • https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/rm/v72/i2/p3
  • This publication is cited in the following 34 articles:
    Citing articles in Google Scholar: Russian citations, English citations
    Related articles in Google Scholar: Russian articles, English articles
    Успехи математических наук Russian Mathematical Surveys
    Statistics & downloads:
    Abstract page:1429
    Russian version PDF:208
    English version PDF:75
    References:82
    First page:52
     
      Contact us:
     Terms of Use  Registration to the website  Logotypes © Steklov Mathematical Institute RAS, 2024