Russian Mathematical Surveys
RUS  ENG    JOURNALS   PEOPLE   ORGANISATIONS   CONFERENCES   SEMINARS   VIDEO LIBRARY   PACKAGE AMSBIB  
General information
Latest issue
Archive
Impact factor
Submit a manuscript

Search papers
Search references

RSS
Latest issue
Current issues
Archive issues
What is RSS



Uspekhi Mat. Nauk:
Year:
Volume:
Issue:
Page:
Find






Personal entry:
Login:
Password:
Save password
Enter
Forgotten password?
Register


Russian Mathematical Surveys, 1973, Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 33–64
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1070/RM1973v028n02ABEH001529
(Mi rm4861)
 

This article is cited in 14 scientific papers (total in 15 papers)

Regular Markov processes

E. B. Dynkin
References:
Abstract: This article is concerned with the foundations of the theory of Markov processes. We introduce the concepts of a regular Markov process and the class of such processes. We show that regular processes possess a number of good properties (strong Markov character, continuity on the right of excessive functions along almost all trajectories, and so on). A class of regular Markov processes is constructed by means of an arbitrary transition function (regular re-construction of the canonical class). We also prove a uniqueness theorem. We diverge from tradition in three respects: a) we investigate processes on an arbitrary random time interval; b) all definitions and results are formulated in terms of measurable structures without the use of topology (except for the topology of the real line); c) our main objects of study are non-homogeneous processes (homogeneous ones are discussed as an important special case). In consequence of a), the theory is highly symmetrical: there is no longer disparity between the birth time $\alpha$ of the process, which is usually fixed, and the terminal time $\beta$, which is considered random. Principle b) does not prevent us from introducing, when necessary, various topologies in the state space (as systems of coordinates are introduced in geometry). However, it is required that the final statements should be invariant with respect to the choice of such a topology. Finally, the main gain from c) is simplification of the theory: discarding the “burden of homogeneity” we can use constructions which, generally speaking, destroy this homogeneity. Similar questions have been considered (for the homogeneous case) by Knight [8], Doob [2], [3] and other authors.
Bibliographic databases:
Document Type: Article
MSC: 60Jxx, 60Gxx
Language: English
Original paper language: Russian
Citation: E. B. Dynkin, “Regular Markov processes”, Russian Math. Surveys, 28:2 (1973), 33–64
Citation in format AMSBIB
\Bibitem{Dyn73}
\by E.~B.~Dynkin
\paper Regular Markov processes
\jour Russian Math. Surveys
\yr 1973
\vol 28
\issue 2
\pages 33--64
\mathnet{http://mi.mathnet.ru//eng/rm4861}
\crossref{https://doi.org/10.1070/RM1973v028n02ABEH001529}
\mathscinet{http://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=400410}
\zmath{https://zbmath.org/?q=an:0334.60031|0385.60059}
Linking options:
  • https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/rm4861
  • https://doi.org/10.1070/RM1973v028n02ABEH001529
  • https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/rm/v28/i2/p35
  • This publication is cited in the following 15 articles:
    Citing articles in Google Scholar: Russian citations, English citations
    Related articles in Google Scholar: Russian articles, English articles
    Успехи математических наук Russian Mathematical Surveys
     
      Contact us:
     Terms of Use  Registration to the website  Logotypes © Steklov Mathematical Institute RAS, 2024