|
Problemy Upravleniya, 2012, Issue 4, Pages 75–78
(Mi pu732)
|
|
|
|
This article is cited in 2 scientific papers (total in 2 papers)
Letters to the Editor
Another note on the incorrectness of the analytic hierarchy process
V. V. Podinovskia, O. V. Podinovskayab a National Research University — Higher School of Economics, Mocsow
b Bank VTB-24, Moscow
Abstract:
In authors' previous paper published in 2011 in “Control Sciences” journal one example of a bi-criterion decision analysis problem demonstrating that the use of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) may lead to a clearly erroneous result is given. However, the author of another paper published in 2012 in the same journal suggested that he found an error in our use of AHP and, consequently, our criticism of AHP is unsubstantiated. In this new paper the authors show that there was no mistake in the use of AHP in their original counter-example, and provide two further counter-examples that support their original conclusion.
Keywords:
multiple criteria decision making, analytic hierarchy process, descriptive and normative approaches, ratio scale, priorities of variants, measurement theory.
Citation:
V. V. Podinovski, O. V. Podinovskaya, “Another note on the incorrectness of the analytic hierarchy process”, Probl. Upr., 2012, no. 4, 75–78
Linking options:
https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/pu732 https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/pu/v4/p75
|
Statistics & downloads: |
Abstract page: | 627 | Full-text PDF : | 200 | References: | 59 | First page: | 16 |
|