Videolibrary
RUS  ENG    JOURNALS   PEOPLE   ORGANISATIONS   CONFERENCES   SEMINARS   VIDEO LIBRARY   PACKAGE AMSBIB  
Video Library
Archive
Most viewed videos

Search
RSS
New in collection






Annual Session of Steklov Mathematical Institute (Best results 2024)
November 20, 2024 18:10–18:25, Moscow
 


Landscapes of optimization of quantum gates and observables

A. N. Pechen, V. N. Petruhanov, O. V. Morzhin, B. O. Volkov
Video records:
MP4 399.2 Mb
Supplementary materials:
Adobe PDF 1.4 Mb

Number of views:
This page:290
Video files:84
Materials:18
Youtube:

A. N. Pechen, V. N. Petruhanov, O. V. Morzhin, B. O. Volkov
Photo Gallery



Abstract: In the tasks of control of quantum systems, the study of the landscapes of the underlying objective functionals is of great interest [1]. In the works [2,3], various methods for studying landscapes for generating two-qubit quantum gates in open quantum systems with coherent and incoherent controls were developed. Such examples of quantum gates as C-NOT, SWAP and C-PHASE were considered. Three types of objective functionals were consructed that exploit either the full basis or three special states, and the study and comparison of the corresponding control landscapes was carried out. For this, varous methods for studying the control landscapes in such systems were applied such as based on the inGRAPE (Incoherent GRAPE) local search algorithm, previously developed in [4], and on the global stochastic optimization in the double annealing algorithm. Explicit expressions were obtained for gradients and Hessians of the constructed objective functionals. In [5], landscapes of the control problems for generating single-qubit quantum gates H and T ($\pi/8$) were investigated. For Hadamard gate H, a smooth distribution with one peak for the best obtained using the inGRAPE values of the fidelity was found, while for the T gate, the constructed distribution was found to have two separate pikes and moreover, the corresponding controls were found to be substantially separated in the control space. In contrast to the distribution for the single-qubit gate T and similarly to the distribution for the gate H, for the two-qubit gates C-NOT and C-PHASE smooth distributions with one pike were obtained (with possible minor exception for the C-PHASE gate $\pi/2$), indicating the landscape structure without traps [2]. Using analytical and numerical methods, the absence of traps was established for generation of single-qubit phase shift gates in a closed quantum system for small times [6].

Supplementary materials: ПеченьПетрухановМоржинВолков.pdf (1.4 Mb)

References
  1. B. O. Volkov and A. N. Pechen, “Quantum control landscapes and traps”, Russian Microelectronics, 52, Suppl. 1 (2023), S428–S431  crossref
  2. A. N. Pechen, V. N. Petruhanov, O. V. Morzhin, B. O. Volkov, “Control landscapes for high-fidelity generation of C-NOT and C-PHASE gates with coherent and environmental driving”, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 139 (2024), 411, 21 pp., arXiv: 2405.14069  mathnet  crossref  isi
  3. O. V. Morzhin, A. N. Pechen, “Generation of C-NOT, SWAP, and C-Z Gates for two qubits using coherent and incoherent controls and stochastic optimization”, Lobachevskii J. Math., 45:2 (2024), 728–740, arXiv: 2312.05625  mathnet  crossref
  4. V. N. Petruhanov, A. N. Pechen, “GRAPE optimization for open quantum systems with time-dependent decoherence rates driven by coherent and incoherent controls”, J. Phys. A, 56:30 (2023), 305303, 26 pp., arXiv: 2307.08479  mathnet  crossref  mathscinet  isi
  5. V. N. Petruhanov, A. N. Pechen, “Quantum control landscapes for generation of H and T gates in an open qubit with both coherent and environmental drive”, Photonics, 10:11 (2023), 1200, 19 pp., arXiv: 2309.02063  mathnet  crossref
  6. Izv. Math., 87:5 (2023), 906–919  mathnet  crossref  crossref  mathscinet  adsnasa  isi  scopus


Related articles:
 
  Contact us:
 Terms of Use  Registration to the website  Logotypes © Steklov Mathematical Institute RAS, 2025