Abstract:
Based both on the practice of post-processing by a human expert and on the higher values of the accuracy metrics of machine learning scoring functions, it is suggested that when estimating the free energy of binding in a ligand–receptor complex, a significant part of intermolecular interactions is still not explicitly taken into account. An assessment is made of how explicit consideration of non-complementary ligand–receptor interactions could improve the accuracy of the description of contemporary classical scoring functions, which tend to use only terms of complementary/favorable interactions.
Citation:
A. R. Shaimardanov, D. A. Shulga, V. A. Palyulin, “On importance of explicit account of non-complementary contacts in scoring functions”, Mendeleev Commun., 33:6 (2023), 802–805
Linking options:
https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/mendc530
https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/mendc/v33/i6/p802
This publication is cited in the following 2 articles:
Arslan R. Shaimardanov, Dmitry A. Shulga, Vladimir A. Palyulin, “Do electrostatic interactions make a difference in physics‐based AutoDock4 scoring function?”, J Comput Chem, 45:21 (2024), 1806
I. V. Svitanko, T. S. Pivina, “Molecular modeling in synthesis: from statistical methods to quantum chemistry and practical applications”, Russ Chem Bull, 73:5 (2024), 1093