|
This article is cited in 12 scientific papers (total in 12 papers)
Burning-rate behavior in aluminized wide-distribution AP composite propellants
M. Q. Brewster, J. C. Mullen University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, 61801, USA
Abstract:
Burning-rate behavior of aluminized, wide-distribution ammonium-perchlorate (AP), hydroxyl-terminated-polybutadiene (HTPB) binder composite propellants, both 2D laminates and 3D particulate propellants, is investigated experimentally. Very fine (2-$\mu$m) AP (FAP) is used at a high FAP/binder ratio (75/25) with either coarse (>200 $\mu$m) AP (CAP) particles (3D particulate propellants) or pressed AP slabs (simulating CAP particles in over-ventilated, 2D laminates). The results indicate that, while aluminum does not significantly alter the AP/binder flame structure, it can either increase the burning rate via radiative feedback or decrease it via inert heat-sink effects, depending on pressure (competing conductive heat feedback). Otherwise, the AP/binder flame structure is similar to that found previously for non-aluminized laminates, with minor differences. The FAP/HTPB-matrix burns with a one-dimensional premixed flame not hot enough to ignite aluminum, but hot enough to self-deflagrate if a modest amount of an external radiant flux (in the case considered, supplied by aluminum ignited downstream by the CAP/matrix flame) is present. The CAP/matrix interaction flame burns in either a split-diffusion or merged, partially premixed mode, depending on pressure and fuel-layer thickness. A correlation between the burningrate pressure exponent and the CAP/matrix flame-regime pressure dependence is found in terms of the Peclet number in accordance with a simple, conserved-scalar (mixture fraction) theory.
Keywords:
burning rate, composite propellant, ammonium perchlorate, laminate, aluminized.
Received: 26.05.2010
Citation:
M. Q. Brewster, J. C. Mullen, “Burning-rate behavior in aluminized wide-distribution AP composite propellants”, Fizika Goreniya i Vzryva, 47:2 (2011), 81–92; Combustion, Explosion and Shock Waves, 47:2 (2011), 200–208
Linking options:
https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/fgv1086 https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/fgv/v47/i2/p81
|
|