Computer Research and Modeling
RUS  ENG    JOURNALS   PEOPLE   ORGANISATIONS   CONFERENCES   SEMINARS   VIDEO LIBRARY   PACKAGE AMSBIB  
General information
Latest issue
Archive

Search papers
Search references

RSS
Latest issue
Current issues
Archive issues
What is RSS



Computer Research and Modeling:
Year:
Volume:
Issue:
Page:
Find






Personal entry:
Login:
Password:
Save password
Enter
Forgotten password?
Register


Computer Research and Modeling, 2020, Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages 1427–1449
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20537/2076-7633-2020-12-6-1427-1449
(Mi crm858)
 

This article is cited in 4 scientific papers (total in 4 papers)

ANALYSIS AND MODELING OF COMPLEX LIVING SYSTEMS

Modelling of carbon dioxide net ecosystem exchange of hayfield on drained peat soil: land use scenario analysis

D. V. Ilyasova, A. G. Molchanova, M. V. Glagolevabcd, G. G. Suvorova, A. A. Sirina

a Institute of Forest Science Russian Academy of Sciences, 21 Sovetskaya st., Uspenskoye, Moscow region, 143030, Russia
b Yugra State University, 16 Chekhova st., Khanty-Mansiysk, 628012, Russia
c A. N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution Russian Academy of Sciences, 33 Leninskiy prospect, Moscow, 119071, Russia
d Lomonosov Moscow State University, 1/12 Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russia
References:
Abstract: The data of episodic field measurements of carbon dioxide balance components (soil respiration — $R_{soil}$, ecosystem respiration — $R_{eco}$, net ecosystem exchange — NEE) of hayfields under use and abandoned one are interpreted by modelling. The field measurements were carried within five field campaigns in 2018 and 2019 on the drained part of the Dubna Peatland in Taldom District, Moscow Oblast, Russia. The territory is within humid continental climate zone. Peatland drainage was done out for milled peat extraction. After extraction was stopped, the residual peat deposit (1–1.5 m) was ploughed and grassed (Poa pratensis L.) for hay production. The current ground water level (GWL) varies from 0.3–0.5 m below the surface during wet and up to 1.0 m during dry periods. Daily dynamics of CO$_2$ fluxes was measured using dynamic chamber method in 2018 (August) and 2019 (May, June, August) for abandoned ditch spacing only with sanitary mowing once in 5 years and the ditch spacing with annual mowing. NEE and $R_{eco}$ were measured on the sites with original vegetation, and $R_{soil}$ — after vegetation removal. To model a seasonal dynamics of NEE, the dependence of its components ($R_{eco}$, $R_{soil}$, and Gross ecosystem — atmosphere exchange of carbon dioxide — GEE) from soil and air temperature, GWL, photosynthetically active radiation, underground and aboveground plant biomass were used. The parametrization of the models has been carried out considering the stability of coefficients estimated by the bootstrap method. $R^2$ ($\alpha=0.05$) between simulated and measured $R_{eco}$ was 0.44 ($p<0.0003$) on abandoned and 0.59 ($p<0.04$) on under use hayfield, and GEE was 0.57 ($p<0.0002$) and 0.77 ($p<0.00001$), respectively. Numerical experiments were carried out to assess the influence of different haymaking regime on NEE. It was found that NEE for the season (May 15 – September 30) did not differ much between the hayfield without mowing ($4.5\pm 1.0$ tC$\cdot$ha$^{-1}\cdot$season$^{-1}$) and the abandoned one ($6.2\pm 1.4$). Single mowing during the season leads to increase of NEE up to $6.5\pm 0.9$, and double mowing — up to $7.5\pm 1.4$ tC$\cdot$ha$^{-1}\cdot$season$^{-1}$. This means increase of carbon losses and CO$_2$ emission into the atmosphere. Carbon loss on hayfield for both single and double mowing scenario was comparable with abandoned hayfield. The value of removed phytomass for single and double mowing was $0.8\pm 0.1$ tC$\cdot$ha$^{-1}\cdot$season$^{-1}$ and $1.4\pm 0.1$ (45% carbon content in dry phytomass) or 3.0 and 4.4 tC$\cdot$ha$^{-1}\cdot$season$^{-1}$ of hay (17% moisture content).
In comparison with the fallow, the removal of biomass of $0.8\pm 0.1$ at single and $1.4\pm 0.1$ tC$\cdot$ha$^{-1}\cdot$season$^{-1}$ double mowing is accompanied by an increase in carbon loss due to CO$_2$ emissions, i.e., the growth of NEE by $0.3\pm 0.1$ and $1.3\pm 0.6$ tC$\cdot$ha$^{-1}\cdot$season$^{-1}$, respectively. This corresponds to the growth of NEE for each ton of withdrawn phytomass per hectare of $0.4\pm 0.2$ tC$\cdot$ha$^{-1}\cdot$season$^{-1}$ at single mowing, and $0.9\pm 0.7$ tC$\cdot$ha$^{-1}\cdot$season$^{-1}$ at double mowing. Therefore, single mowing is more justified in terms of carbon loss than double mowing. Extensive mowing does not increase CO$_2$ emissions into the atmosphere and allows, in addition, to “replace” part of the carbon loss by agricultural production.
Keywords: modelling CO$_2$ balance, model stability, dynamic chamber, drained peat, peat soils, hayfields, soil respiration, ecosystem respiration, photosynthesis.
Funding agency Grant number
Russian Science Foundation 19-74-20185
Немецкий банк развития KfW 11 III 040 RUS K
The work was supported by the project “Restoration of peatlands in Russia for fire prevention and climate change mitigation”, funded by the International Climate Initiative of the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety and managed through the German development bank KfW (project no. 11 III 040 RUS K Restoration of peatlands) as well as the Russian Science Foundation project 19-74-20185.
Received: 16.06.2020
Revised: 21.09.2020
Accepted: 25.09.2020
Document Type: Article
UDC: 631.1:631.5
Language: Russian
Citation: D. V. Ilyasov, A. G. Molchanov, M. V. Glagolev, G. G. Suvorov, A. A. Sirin, “Modelling of carbon dioxide net ecosystem exchange of hayfield on drained peat soil: land use scenario analysis”, Computer Research and Modeling, 12:6 (2020), 1427–1449
Citation in format AMSBIB
\Bibitem{IlyMolGla20}
\by D.~V.~Ilyasov, A.~G.~Molchanov, M.~V.~Glagolev, G.~G.~Suvorov, A.~A.~Sirin
\paper Modelling of carbon dioxide net ecosystem exchange of hayfield on drained peat soil: land use scenario analysis
\jour Computer Research and Modeling
\yr 2020
\vol 12
\issue 6
\pages 1427--1449
\mathnet{http://mi.mathnet.ru/crm858}
\crossref{https://doi.org/10.20537/2076-7633-2020-12-6-1427-1449}
Linking options:
  • https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/crm858
  • https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/crm/v12/i6/p1427
  • This publication is cited in the following 4 articles:
    Citing articles in Google Scholar: Russian citations, English citations
    Related articles in Google Scholar: Russian articles, English articles
    Computer Research and Modeling
    Statistics & downloads:
    Abstract page:168
    Full-text PDF :70
    References:30
     
      Contact us:
     Terms of Use  Registration to the website  Logotypes © Steklov Mathematical Institute RAS, 2024