Chebyshevskii Sbornik
RUS  ENG    JOURNALS   PEOPLE   ORGANISATIONS   CONFERENCES   SEMINARS   VIDEO LIBRARY   PACKAGE AMSBIB  
General information
Latest issue
Archive

Search papers
Search references

RSS
Latest issue
Current issues
Archive issues
What is RSS



Chebyshevskii Sb.:
Year:
Volume:
Issue:
Page:
Find






Personal entry:
Login:
Password:
Save password
Enter
Forgotten password?
Register


Chebyshevskii Sbornik, 2019, Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 561–578
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22405/2226-8383-2018-20-2-561-578
(Mi cheb790)
 

HISTORY OF MATHEMATICS AND APPLICATIONS

Historiographic discussion on the origin of Chinese astronomy

G. I. Sinkevich

Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (St. Petersburg)
References:
Abstract: The biggest, but not the only, European mystification about the ancient origin of Chinese astronomy, occurred in the 17th century. According to Chinese sources, astronomy dates back to the middle of the third millennium B.C. The reliability of the sources is debatable. In 213–212 B.C., the emperor Qin Shi Huang ordered the destruction of all manuscripts except palace chronicles and practical books. At the turn of the 2 and 1 c. B.C. the historian Sima Qian wrote the "Records of the Grand Historian". This monumental work outlines the ancient legends and chronicles from the 8 century B.C. For a long time, China was closed to Europeans, the first popular European book about China was written by Marco Polo (13 c.). In the 17–18 centuries, in China the Jesuit mission resided. The mission included 36 astronomers who, with their reports, created among the Europeans an idea of the antiquity of Chinese astronomy. The subsequent discussion questioned this idea. From the 19th century, the Petersburg Academy of Sciences was represented in Pekin. Chinese studies (Sinology) arose due to the work of various missions, and many profound researchers emerged from the missionaries, the remarkable Russian Sinologists were among them. The works of the 19 and 20 centuries continue the debate about the authenticity of ancient sources. We consider the history of this discussion and the main arguments of the parties, including the works of P.-S. Laplace, K. A. Skachkov, G. N. Popov, A. V. Marakuev, N. J. Needham, N. Sivin, E. I. Beryozkina, Cheng-Yih Chen, V. Ye. Eremeyev.
Keywords: ancient Chinese astronomy, history.
Received: 28.01.2019
Accepted: 12.07.2019
Document Type: Article
UDC: 52(091)
Language: Russian
Citation: G. I. Sinkevich, “Historiographic discussion on the origin of Chinese astronomy”, Chebyshevskii Sb., 20:2 (2019), 561–578
Citation in format AMSBIB
\Bibitem{Sin19}
\by G.~I.~Sinkevich
\paper Historiographic discussion on the origin of Chinese astronomy
\jour Chebyshevskii Sb.
\yr 2019
\vol 20
\issue 2
\pages 561--578
\mathnet{http://mi.mathnet.ru/cheb790}
\crossref{https://doi.org/10.22405/2226-8383-2018-20-2-561-578}
Linking options:
  • https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/cheb790
  • https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/cheb/v20/i2/p561
  • Citing articles in Google Scholar: Russian citations, English citations
    Related articles in Google Scholar: Russian articles, English articles
    Statistics & downloads:
    Abstract page:277
    Full-text PDF :181
    References:21
     
      Contact us:
     Terms of Use  Registration to the website  Logotypes © Steklov Mathematical Institute RAS, 2024